Smart waste management perspective of COVID

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 2904 (2023) Cite this article

1086 Accesses

1 Citations

2 Altmetric

Metrics details

This paper presents a new method for determining the effect of healthy personal protective material (HPPM) stripes, such as surgical masks, protective suits, and overhead and foot covers, on the durability and physicomechanical characteristics of concrete for use in architectural forms. Because of the current global epidemic caused by coronavirus (COVID-19), the use of HPPM, such as surgical masks, protective suits, and overhead and foot covers, has increased considerably. COVID-19’s second and third waves are currently affecting various countries, necessitating the use of facemasks (FM). Consequently, millions of single FM have been discharged into the wild, washing up on beaches, floating beneath the seas, and ending up in hazardous locations. The effect of stripe fibers on the physicomechanical characteristics of concrete, such as the workability, Uniaxial Compressive Strength UCS, flexural strength, impact strength, spalling resistance, abrasion resistance, sorptivity, Water absorption Sw, porosity (ηe), water penetration, permeability, and economic and eco-friendly aspects, need to be determined. With a focus on HPPM, especially single-use facemasks, this study investigated an innovative way to incorporate pandemic waste into concrete structures. Scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffraction patterns were employed to analyze the microstructures and interfacial transition zones and to identify the elemental composition. The HPPM had a pore-blocking effect, which reduced the permeability and capillary porosity. Additionally, the best concentrations of HPPM, particularly of masks, were applied by volume at 0, 1, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%. The use of mixed fibers from different HPPMs increased the strength and overall performance of concrete samples. The tendency of growing strength began to disappear at approximately 2%. The results of this investigation showed that the stripe content had no effect on the compressive strength. However, the stripe is critical for determining the flexural strength of concrete. The UCS increased steadily between 1 and 1.5% before falling marginally at 2.5%, which indicates that incorporating HPPM into concrete had a significant impact on the UCS of the mixture. The addition of HPPM to the mixtures considerably modified the failure mode of concrete from brittle to ductile. Water absorption in hardened concrete is reduced when HPPM stripes and fibers were added separately in low-volume fractions to the concrete mixture. The concrete containing 2% HPPM fibers had the lowest water absorption and porosity percentage. The HPPM fibers were found to act as bridges across cracks, enhancing the transfer capability of the matrices. From a technological and environmental standpoint, this study found that using HPPM fibers in the production of concrete is viable.

Concrete has a strong compressive strength but a tensile strength ten times that of steel. It also has a brittle property, which prevents stress transmission after cracking. It is feasible to add fibers to concrete mixes to prevent brittle failure and increase the mechanical qualities. Healthy Personal Protective Materials (HPPM) stripes are cementitious composite materials with scattered fibers, such as steel, polymer, polypropylene, carbon, and glass1. The protection of steel bars from corrosion and sulfate attack, as well as from water and ion infiltration through pores and cracks, is linked to improving the longevity of reinforced concrete2. As a result, both the insertion of fibers and the replacement of traditional reinforcement with fibers are favourable in terms of long-term development1. Polypropylene fiber-reinforced concrete was experimentally investigated by3. The compressive strength decreased marginally over the testing period after the addition of a 3% polypropylene stripe by volume, with the most significant reduction at 10%. The splitting tensile strength improved by 39%, whereas compressive strength reduced with the inclusion of a 1% polypropylene stripe by volume.

In comparison to the fiber with the smallest size, scientists found that increasing the quantity of the fiber increased compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths by 10, 14, and 58%, respectively. Furthermore, based on the findings of4, thin fibers may be a viable solution for reducing creep strain. The efficiency of fibers is determined not only by the metrics listed above but also by their concrete bonding strength5. In addition, fibers can be crimped, twisted, sinusoidal, or hooked to improve their contact surface with the matrix, and their indents can be fibrillated (the ends split during mixing). The mechanical properties of concrete mixtures are also affected by the fiber form6.

Xu et al.7 conducted similar experiments on fiber-reinforced concrete and discovered that when cellulose fiber (CTF) was used at dosages of 1.5 kg/m3, the concrete's Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) increased to 12%; however, when polyvinyl alcohol fiber (PF) was used at dosages of approximately 4.0 kg/m3, the concrete’s UCS was reduced by 35%. When the dosage was increased to 2.0 kg/m3, CTF's splitting tensile strength declined by 23%, while PF's decreased by 55%. The splitting tensile strength of the polyolefin fibers also degraded. Additionally, the use of fiber reinforcement in concrete imposes specific mix composition constraints; therefore, it may be necessary to make changes8. The number, form, and slenderness of fibers affect the workability of concrete1,9,10,11. It’s a promising field of use, particularly in metropolitan locations where there are adverse environmental conditions, damage caused by environmental conditions, abrasion of surfaces, and vandalism. However, HPPM fibers are more commonly used in architectural applications. Specifically, HPPM fibers are particularly successful in reducing plastic shrinkage fractures soon after concrete is made, and they considerably improve its post-cracking behavior.

Kilmartin-Lynch et al.12 have presented an innovative method for integrating single-use face masks in the production of concrete. The method examined the impact of adding PPE on enhancing the mechanical characteristics of concrete by using cement and other aggregates that are frequently found in Australia, together with water reducer, and using rare lower amounts of PPE (i.e., 0.10%, 0.15%, 0.20%, and 0.25%).

Koniorczyk et al.13 used the recommended dosage of 1 mask per 1 L of concrete. According to their findings, adding processed masks improved compressive strength (by about 5%) and tensile strength (by about 3%).

Castellote et al.14 added surgical wear masks (WM) to mortars in amounts up to 5% of the cement weight. The characterization of the mechanical and microstructural aspects has been done in their work. The findings show that adding MW to cement precludes a deterioration in the material's qualities, including strength and durability behavior.

Researchers have identified a number of benefits of employing HPPM in concrete mixtures, but few studies have been conducted on enhancing the durability and engineering qualities of concrete for use in buildings. Owing to the strong effect of HPPM on concrete behavior, multiple laboratory samples containing various percentages of HPPM were made in this study by utilizing the standard mix of concrete for architectural fabrication.

The primary goal of this study was to explore whether single-use facemasks can be recycled and reused to reduce the amount of pandemic-related garbage that ends up in landfills or litters the streets during this crisis. We studied the influence of HPPM fibers on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete and how HPPM fibers might be employed in a potential sector of application, such as public spaces. This is an interdisciplinary study that involves both engineering and architecture. This revolutionary technique provides understanding of this topic by integrating various areas of knowledge and is noteworthy because no previous study has been published on the use of HPPM fibers in public settings.

Type I ordinary Portland cement from Najran cement (OPC) was used in this study. The specific gravity of the cement was 3.15, and it had a Blaine fineness of 410 m2/kg. The Bogue phases of the cement, according to the manufacturer, were 59% C3S, 12.1% C2S, 10.6% C3A, and 10.4% C4AF. The oxides found in the cement are listed in Table 1.

To cast the concrete samples that met ASTM C33/C33M-18, the fine aggregate was gathered from natural sand with a maximum size of 4.75 mm, and the coarse aggregate was natural crushed stone with a maximum size of 20 mm. The physical parameters of the aggregates are presented in Table 2. Coarse sand was employed as a fine aggregate in the concrete samples, and crushed stone chips complying with ASTM C33 were used as coarse aggregates. Table 2 lists the physical features of these aggregates.

Concrete mixtures and curing were performed using potable tap water. The ASTM C1602/C1602M criterion was satisfied for the properties of water.

The polypropylene stripes (HPPM) used in this study are commercially available, such as polypropylene stripes from surgical masks, protective suits, and overhead and foot covers, as indicated in Fig. 1. The collected polypropylene stripes from surgical masks, protective suits, and overhead and foot covers have the same properties12,13,15. Since the polypropylene stripes have the same properties so the different proportions of these HPPMs will not affect the results. Polypropylene fibers were mixed into concrete at a rate of 2.5% of the total volume.

Experiment protocols, casting, and curing of the concrete with HPPM.

The samples mixed with cut-up HPPM were analyzed using six concrete combinations in proportions of 0% (control mix), 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5% by volume of concrete (three samples for each mix). This choice is in line with prior studies by3,7,16. Najran cement with a specific gravity of 3.15 and a bulk density of 1250–1650 kg/m3 was utilized throughout the experiments, as well as coarse aggregates with a nominal size of 20 mm and fine aggregates with a specific gravity of 2.63, which were oven-dried for 48 h at 110 °C to remove excess moisture. Table 1 lists the cement parameters used. The physical parameters of the HPPM and fine and coarse aggregates are listed in Table 2. New and unused HPPM were utilized in this study to limit community transmission and infection risk from the coronavirus. The HPPM was cut into small pieces with a length of 1 cm and a width of 1 cm (Fig. 1).

Table 3 shows the mix design used to cast the samples and the varied amounts of HPPM. CM0 denotes a control mix containing no surgical masks, whereas CM25 denotes concrete with a 2.5% by volume concentration.

In a reference mixer, the concrete samples were prepared according to ASTM C192M with a water/cement ratio of 0.50. No additional materials or chemical admixtures were used in this study. HPPM fibers were employed in the proportions of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5% as an extra percentage. The concrete was mixed and placed into various molds (cubes, cylinders, and prisms) for 24 h before being demolded and cured in clean drinkable tap water. The concrete samples were cured for 28 d at room temperature from 21 to 24 °C (Fig. 1).

All dry materials were weighed and then mixed in a concrete mixer for 3 min to mix. After 3 min of mixing with water, the dry materials were gently added and combined for another 3 min. After detachment from the mixer, concrete was poured into cylindrical molds. To avoid concrete adhesion, the inner surfaces of the assembled molds were thinly coated with mold oil. To allow the concrete to settle, cylindrical molds were filled with concrete and placed on a vibrating table for 20 s. The molds were filled with concrete after the first 20 s and then vibrated for another 20 s to ensure the absence of voids. The new concrete surface was finished by using a smooth steel trowel. The specimens were taken from the molds after 24 h and immediately submerged in clean fresh water for 28 d for the strength test. The procedure was performed for each concrete batch. Previous research 3,16,17 has employed identical casting procedures (1).

The compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength tests were conducted using18,19,20 respectively. The compressive strength test was performed on 100 × 100 × 100 mm3 cube specimens (The results corrected to 15 * 15 cubes according to ASTM C39/C39M-2118), while the split test was performed on samples that were 100 mm in diameter and a height of 200 mm and had a flexural strength of 100 mm diameter, 200 mm height, prism specimens. The cube specimens were weighed in water immediately after they were removed from the water basin in the saturated surface dry state and in the dry state to determine the sample densities. The compression testing apparatus had a force of 2000 kg per square meter. Three samples from each mix configuration were inspected for defects before they were subjected to a force of 157 kN/min. To assess the homogeneity and structural integrity of the manufactured HPPM concrete, non-distractive pulse velocity (PV) testing was performed on compression samples in accordance with21. This test can be used to assess the consistency and uniformity of the concrete samples and to assess the cracks and voids that are not visible on the surface. To evaluate the effective porosity, two to three representative specimens (with individual masses > 50 g) from a sample were immersed in water in a desiccator (e). A vacuum pressure of > 800 Pa (required by22) was maintained within the desiccator for at least 2 h to saturate the specimens. The dry (Mdry) and saturated (Msat) masses of a specimen and a saturated specimen suspended in water (Msus) were calculated. To calculate the effective porosity (e) and dry density (dry), the following equations were used:

where ηe = Porosity %, Msat: saturated mass, Mdry: dry mass, MSSD: saturated surface dry mass.

After 28 d of curing, the concrete samples were removed from the curing tank and allowed to dry. The tops of the cylindrical samples were ground back after air-drying to produce a smooth contact surface with the compression and testing gear, as per ASTM C31/C31M-21. The loading rate was 0.34 MPa/s18.

A Hitachi U8040 scanning electron microscope was used for the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study. The liquid permeabilities of the hardened specimens were determined according to23. A 150-mm cube specimen was used for the permeability test. Before we measured the permeability, the specimen was cured for 28 d. Figure 1 depicts the experimental setup for all the tests.

HPPM stripes (polypropylene) have been utilized in concrete as crack-resistant improvement materials. The HPPM was constructed from plastic polypropylene fibers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. It also exhibits high chemical stability and strength. By volume, the fiber content ranged from 0.5 to 2.5%. HPPMs were chopped into small pieces that were 1 cm in length and 1 cm in width. The physical parameters of single-use HPPM are listed in Table 4.

Figure 2a,b show the facemask and HPPM fiber integrated X-ray diffraction patterns. The diffraction peaks of all fibers were obtained between 10 and 30 degrees, as shown in Fig. 2b. The peaks obtained at approximately 14°, 17°, 18.6°, 21–22°, and 28° are similar to the peaks generated by polypropylene. Any microstructural changes in HPPM were observed using SEM. The HPPM layer (polypropylene) was sliced into a 10 mm × 10 mm size and examined using a SEM (Hitachi, TM3000) at 1000× magnification. Figure 2c shows the structural changes in the polypropylene fibers, such as melting, distortion, tangling, and cracking.

(a) Image of single-use facemask, (b) XRD image of FM fibers, and (c) appearance of facemask layers under scanning electron microscopy at 1000× .

The specimens were studied using XRD to determine the influence of adding HPPM fibers to the concrete mixtures on the phase changes. Figure 3 shows the results of the 2% HPPM test at 28 d. The crystalline phases of portlandite Ca(OH)2, calcite Ca(CO)3, and silicon dioxide (SiO2) are the primary peaks. The Ca(CO)3 and Ca(OH)2 levels did not change appreciably when HPPM fibers were added. Similarly, when the fibers were added, they were observed at 650 intensity. This phenomenon demonstrates that the fibers are incapable of participating in chemical processes. Furthermore, the presence of amorphous materials is indicated by the convex form between 2 theta between 16° and 36°.

XRD analysis of concrete with 2% HPPM after 28 days.

Figure 4 depicts the slump values of the concrete mixtures containing various amounts of HPPM as an additive. The slump values were expected to decrease linearly as the percentage of HPPM added to the concrete increased. In comparison to the reference slump of the reference sample, the slump values decreased by approximately 5%, 13%, 20%, 30%, and 43%, respectively. The decreased slump could be attributed to the HPP particle heterogeneity and roughness, which could diminish the fluidity of the mixtures as well as HPPM's high absorption (8.8%), as shown in Fig. 4. Because of the high porosity of HPPM (avg. 8.8%) and high cohesiveness between the HPPM and concrete matrix29, increasing the amount of HPPM resulted in lower slump values. The volume, form, and slenderness of the fibers, as well as the mix composition, influence the workability of concrete1,9,10,11. When the fiber dose exceeds this critical amount, the likelihood of fiber clamping or balling increases, resulting in an uneven fiber distribution and a greater reduction in flowability27.

Slump values of different percentages of HPPM.

The UCS values of the samples are shown in Figure 5. The control mix in the experiment had a 28-d UCS of 448 kg/cm2, but the 2% addition of shredded HPPM by volume produced the best results. For the control mix study, UCS increased steadily between 1 and 1.5 % before falling marginally at 2.5 %. In comparison to the control sample, volume increments of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2% resulted in sample increases of 8.82, 11.05, 13.68, and 9.40 %, respectively (Fig. 5). The results showed that incorporating HPPM into concrete had a significant impact on the UCS of the mixture. In 2020, Xu et al.7 reported similar results for UCS, where the addition of different plastic fibers increased the UCS to the point where it began to fall. The improvement in UCS with the additional content of polypropylene fibers may be related to the fiber’s crack restriction effect, as demonstrated in earlier investigations30. According to a study by31, the declining trend at 2.5 % could be due to the presence of voids at 2.5 % and the existence of weakening interfacial connections between the cut-up HPPM and the cement (2017).

Compressive strength enhanced by the addition of HPPM after 28 days.

When the fiber dosage was increased from 0 to 3%, the UCS increased by 6%32. The addition of HPPM to the mixtures considerably modified the failure mode of concrete from brittle to ductile, as shown in Fig. 6. The specimens did not crush because of the bridging effect of the HPPM fibers, and they maintained their integrity until the completion of the test. It was discovered that mixtures containing HPPM had lower compressive strengths at an early age; however, after a longer curing period, they had higher compressive strengths. This suggests that the effect of bridging fibers can improve the UCS of concrete over time.

Failure mode of the concrete specimens without HPPM under (a) compression load (b–d), modifying the failure mode of concrete from brittle to ductile.

At 28 d, an ultrasonic test was performed on water-saturated cubic concrete specimens of 150 mm to assess the number of internal pores in the specimens. This non-destructive test uses reflected waves that radiate between probes to assess the permeability of a specimen, according to21. The test was performed by crossing the two faces of the specimen with two probes of the instrument. The PV test is a nondestructive method for determining the consistency and efficiency of concrete. Concrete cracks and pores are also referred to as PV33. Non-destructive testing is a good way to assess the quality of concrete. The effects of the PV test are shown in Fig. 7a. PV grew consistently as HPPM content by volume increased until the volume crossed 2.0%, after which it declined marginally to 2.5%, as shown in Fig. 7a. Similarly, for UCS, the HPPM material with a volume of 2.0% produced the best results. According to34,35, concrete with a PV result of more than 4500 m/s is considered outstanding with a high-quality rating. The quality of the concrete decreased once again at the 2.5% volume mark compared to the control specimen in the experiment; regardless, the quality of the concrete improved in all mix designs, signifying beneficial features. According to36, good-quality concrete has no substantial voids or cracks in the ranges mentioned; consequently, as shown by the research of37, the usage of shredded facemasks reduced the number of microcracks in the concrete, thereby enhancing the overall quality of the concrete. The absence of voids or cracks can jeopardize the structural integrity of concrete within the above-mentioned limits. Owing to an increase in void content and thus porosity with increased fiber, PV values tend to drop beyond a fiber composition of 2.5%. According to BIS, the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) values ranged between 3.8 and 4.04 km/s, indicating that the concrete quality is good38. The HPPM was added to the equation, which increased the UPV values up to a particular volume fraction. However, as expected, the increased HPPM stripe content resulted in lower UPV values. This decrease in the change in velocity is thought to be due to the existence of voids and microcracks in the concrete specimens, which reduce the homogeneity at higher fiber volume fractions. For specimens containing HPPM at any %, UPV values ranging from 4200 to 4600 m/s were discovered, and they were regarded as good quality concrete.

(a) P-wave velocity results after 28 days and (b) the relationship between UCS and PV for concrete containing HPPM.

The UPV values are related to their matching cube compressive strength. The relationship between the UCS and UPV values of concrete mixtures that include HPPM fibers is strong, as shown in Fig. 7b. A power regression method was used to correlate the experimental results, with an R2 value of 0.872 for all samples, indicating a high level of confidence in the association.

The sorptivity (S) results are shown in Fig. 8. When fiber concrete is compared to ordinary concrete, S, which is a measure of concrete durability, is lower. It is possible that the loss of connection in the pore space is caused by the porosity of the HPPM fiber filling porosity39. The minimum S for 2% HPPM is 2.55(106) m/s, whereas the maximum value for 2.5% HPPM is 3.46 m/s. Furthermore, all HPPM concretes had a lower S than the control mix, despite the fact that the high value for 2.5% HPPM was similar to a mix with considerable porosity. This result demonstrates the considerable reduction in the capillary n and inner conductivity of the pores when HPPM fibers are used, and it confirms all of the other durability findings in this study.

Sorptivity enhancement by adding HPPM after 28 days.

The FS of UCS and PV follows a similar pattern, with an increase up to 2% of HPPM fiber content and then a reduction as the number of fibers increases. The results shown in this graph (Fig. 9) indicate that, similar to the tensile strength, the concrete flexural strength increased as the HPPM concentration increased. In comparison to the control mix, specimens with HPPM of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% had FS of 17.8, 24, 27.5, 33.4, and 1.6%, respectively. Furthermore, HPPM plays a vital role in the development of FS, particularly after a longer water curing duration. The overall effect of HPPM appears to be geared toward increasing FS, as evidenced by the 33.4% increase in FS of concrete with 2.0% of HPPM. The decrease in FS as fiber content increases can be attributed to the fact that voids in the matrix grow as 2.5% HPPM fibers are added to the matrix. Upon applying HPPM to sustainable concrete, the FS of the sample was considerably boosted. As a result, further FS enhancements may be accomplished by introducing an HPPM with an optimized geometric shape to create a better concrete FS. The adoption of mechanically enhanced fibers with increased bond strength should result in a more resilient structural concrete capable of producing larger residual capacities as a result of developments in recycled HPPM processing.

(a) Fibers intersecting the cracks in the tension zone of the specimens caused an increase in flexural strength (b) enhancement the FS after 28 days after adding the 2% HPPM (c) Influence of HPPM incorporation on flexural strength.

The fibers intersecting the cracks in the tension zone of the specimens caused an increase in the FS. The HPPM fibers flex to hold the crack face separation, offering a larger energy absorption capacity and stress relaxing the micro-cracked area adjacent to the crack tip (Fig. 9a,b). This could be caused by the decreased workability of concrete at larger volume fractions in the mixtures. The recorded FS values of the prismatic beams are shown in Fig. 9c.

Regarding the number of blows required to cause the concrete specimen to collapse, the IMs of concrete was investigated for different volume fractions of HPPM fibers. PPF improves the impact resistance of concrete40. The addition of just 1% micro PPF increased the number of blows till failure by nearly thrice41. The number of blows at first crack was assessed to be 76, 35, 546, 654, 987, and 698 percent for 0 percent, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5% of HPPM, respectively, when HPPM was added to concrete mixtures. Furthermore, with 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5% of HPPM, the number of strikes required to destroy the sample increased 3.0, 3.3, and 4.8 times, respectively (Fig. 10). These findings are consistent with42, which found that the number of blows for failure increased from 76 (100%) for ordinary concrete to 355 (367.105%), 546 (618.421%), 654 (760.526%) 987(1198.68%), and 689 (818.421%) for concrete with HPPM fibers equal to 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, and 2.5%, respectively, for concrete with HPPM fibers equal to mix control (Fig. 10).

Influence of HPPM incorporation on Impact resistance.

Furthermore, compared to concrete without fibers, the proportion of spalling for PPFRC is lower43. This is owing to advancements in fire protection. HPPM melts at 160 °C, whereas spalling occurs at 190 °C44. As a result, as fibers melt, empty channels emerge, and a new pathway is generated for gas to escape. Simultaneously, it lowers the internal pore pressure. These findings were also confirmed by45,46 and others. Finally, the HPPM considerably improved the fire resistance of the concrete.

The use of HPPM fibers improves the abrasion resistance of concrete. Horszczaruk47 demonstrated that after including 0.9 kg/m3 of fibers, the mean depth of wear for HPPM fell from 29 to 42% compared to that of plain concrete. The increase in abrasion resistance of concretes containing fibrillated 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% HPPM varied from 6.4, 5.7, 4.9, 3.7, to 4.6%, depending on the water to cement ratio48.

This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that incorporating HPPM fibers into concrete inhibits the creation of cracks and effectively diminishes its intrinsic cracking tendency. Furthermore, the pore-blocking effect of HPPM fibers causes the pore structures in hardened concrete to become more detached, resulting in less capillary porosity and lower water penetration of the concrete. In addition, HPPM’s abrasion resistance strength improved. Regarding the resistance to abrasion damage, the HPPM fibers outperformed the control concrete (Fig. 11).

Abrasion resistance enhancement 28 days after adding the HPPM.

The resistance of concrete to the intrusion of hostile ions is another important factor that influences its durability. The porosity of concrete is indirectly represented by its absorption characteristics, which provide useful information regarding the permeable pore volume within the concrete and the connectivity between these pores49. The percentage of Sw is a measure of the pore volume or n of concrete after hardening, and it is one of the fundamental factors of concrete durability.

Regarding water absorption, many studies have shown that HPPM absorbs less water than plain concrete. According to50, regular concrete absorbs 1.52% water, whereas concrete containing 1.5, 3.0, or 4.5% PPF absorbs 39, 46, or 49 % of water, respectively. Similarly, in51 the water absorption was reduced by approximately 45%, from 2.481 to 1.366%. PPFRC absorbed 24.7 % less water than concrete without fibers in prior tests52. This could be due to the action of the fibers, limiting the number of cracks to a minimum. Fibers, however, have been shown in some tests to have a negative impact on absorbability.

Our findings show that injecting HPPM into concrete significantly reduces its Sw. When compared to the respective values obtained from control concrete mixtures, the water absorption of concrete mixtures with 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% HPPM decreased by 25% and 36%, respectively. The results of polypropylene HPPM fiber-reinforced concrete show that HPPM fibers favorably reduce the concrete water absorption. As shown in Fig. 12a, the increased fiber content resulted in a greater reduction in water absorption. As a result, among all HPPM fiber-reinforced concretes evaluated in this study, the combination containing 2% HPPM fiber exhibited the lowest water absorption. Adding fibers to concrete provides a variety of advantages, but it also causes the thickness of the transition zone to increase in hybrid fiber-reinforced concretes.

Influence of HPPM on (a) water absorption (Sw) and (b) porosity (n) as reported in selected studies.

The influence of HPPM on porosity cannot be clearly measured, as shown in Fig. 12b. Workability is influenced by a number of factors, one of which is the distribution of fibers within the mixture and the level of porosity. Studies have shown that when the fiber dosage increases, the porosity increases53. Porosity can decrease when the addition of fibers is confined to a lower amount, and then it can increase again with larger fiber additions, as shown previously54. The porosities of the concrete with 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% HPPM were 4.9, 4.3, 5.2, 3.6, 4.3, and 5.5%, respectively, in this study. A summary of the effect of HPPM fiber incorporation on concrete porosity is provided in Fig. 12b. Adding more than 2.5% of HPPM fibers to the concrete resulted in increased transition zone thickness and n and thus a higher Sw. The increased porosity could be due to poor compaction, which could lead to more micro-cracks, unrestrained fibers, cracks, and poor fiber–matrix bonding55.

Because of the pore blocking action of HPPM fibers, all water penetration depths for HPPM were lower than those for the control mix. These findings support the accuracy of the HPPM results.

The specimen with 2% HPPM fiber content had a minimum depth of penetration of 7.4 mm, which was 38.33% less than that of the control mix. The decrease in HPPM depth of water penetration and then increase (11.6 at 2.5%) could be attributed to an increase in “n” as the HPPM fiber content increased. In fact, the 2% decrease in water depth is most likely attributable to pore blockage and decreased capillary porosity. This result supports the results of other durability tests presented in this study. Figure 13 shows the depth of water penetration at 28 d.

Depth of water penetration versus HPPM fiber content after 28 days.

In addition, the effect of HPPM fibers on permeability is not well understood. 3 found that adding PPF to concrete increased both water and gas permeability. Hager et al.56 reported a similar finding. Many studies, on the other hand, have discovered that fibers have a favorable effect on permeability. According to57, the addition of PPF to concrete reduces the duration of water permeability. Similarly, samples with fibers demonstrated poorer permeability than samples without fibers58. Studies have also shown that permeability declines as the volume of fibers increases up to a certain point, then increases, and sometimes exceeds that of plain concrete59. This is usually due to a lack of workability and an excessive amount of fibers in the mixture.

The presence of HPPM fibers in concrete reduces the likelihood of the concrete breaking by limiting crack formation. Fibers also cause the pore structures in hardened concrete to become more separated, resulting in a lower capillary porosity and concrete water penetration.

The microstructure of the HPPM fibers with 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% volume fractions were examined using SEM to evaluate the bond characteristics of the mixture. Figure 14a,b depict the HPPM fiber–matrix interface of a concrete composite that included HPPM fibers and fiber bridging following a fracture. The results of compressive and flexural tests on the concrete incorporated with HPPM fibers showed that the fiber–matrix interface was stronger and that the fiber–matrix bond was stronger.

SEM images of concrete with HPPM fibers. (a) Cubes with different percentages of HPPM, (b–f) 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5% of HPPM fibers.

Another disadvantage of concrete is that it breaks almost immediately after it is poured and before it is fully set. These fissures are a key source of concrete weakness, especially in large-scale worksite applications, causing fracture and failure, as well as a general lack of resilience60. Traditional reinforcement and, to a lesser extent, the use of a suitable amount of particular fibers will assist in overcoming tension weakness61. The microstructure of HPPM concrete with a 2% volume fraction of HPPM was investigated using SEM to assess the bond characteristics of HPPM in the mixture. The microstructures at 0.5, 1, and 1.5% of the HPPM surface and hydrated cement matrix after the fracture of the concrete specimen are shown in Fig. 14b–d, respectively. The surface of the HPPM was coated with a densely hydrated cement matrix, as shown in Fig. 14b–d. This event shows that the HPPM and the wet cement matrix formed a strong connection.

The HPPM and cement matrix had a strong interfacial connection, as shown in Fig. 14e. This bonding was important for reducing the size and number of cracks, which led to a 2% increase in HPPM strength. The bridging activity of the fibers, upon which the bridging fibers partially transferred the stress across the crack, could also account for the improved flexural performance of concrete containing HPPM. Similar findings were reported by30, who discovered that adding polypropylene to concrete substantially increased its flexural strength.

At 2% HPPM fiber, the highest compressive strength values were attained. The highest UCS increases measured at 1.5% and 2% HPPM were 13.6% and 9.40%, respectively. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that stripes have a significant effect on the compressive strength. According to these findings, the HPPM stripes have a considerable effect on the UCS values compared to those of the control concrete. The high fineness and variable length of fibers in staple HPPM stripes form a network that works as a bridge, preventing the microfracture from spreading further. When the HPPM stripe level was higher (2.5%), however, the fiber stripes were dispersed unevenly in the concrete owing to poor workability and mixing. As a result, these fiber masses collected to generate weaker locations (Fig. 14f).

After the flexure test, the fibers operated as a bridging element, effectively transferring the load from the matrix to the HPPM fibers, allowing them to take on the additional load, and resulting in an increase in the UCS and FS compared to those of the control concrete. The size and shape of the polypropylene fibers affected the increase in the flexural strength of the concrete. Additionally, as a result of the lower effective w/c ratio, the splitting tensile and FS values were relatively high, with 17.8, 24, 27.5, 33.4, and 1.6% increases in FS at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% HPPM, respectively, compared to those of control samples. In a scattered striped cement matrix, the stress concentrations are not uniform along the length of the fiber.

The combination of HPPM stripes and fibers is a factor that improves the FS. The HPPM stripes flexed to keep the fracture face apart, offering a larger energy absorption capacity while relaxing the microcracked area adjacent to the crack tip. However, a higher fiber content (2.5% HPPM) resulted in a reduction in FS (Fig. 14f). This could be caused by the decreased workability of concrete at larger volume fractions in the mixtures. Inadequate compaction, more micro-cracks, uncontrolled fibers and cracks, and poor fiber–matrix bonding could all contribute to the increased permeability and porosity. HPPM acts as a three-dimensional reinforcement, bridging cracks, and preventing growth and enlargement62. Importantly, cracks are not detrimental to construction or serviceability if they do not exceed a particular size. When concrete transitions from a plastic to a solid state and the Young’s modulus of the concrete exceeds the Young’s modulus of the fibers, micro HPPMs are no longer considered to play a significant role. Furthermore, in a prior study63, the cracking area in concrete with 0.5% PPF was reduced by 99%. PPF prevents cracks from forming not only against plastic shrinkage but also against drying shrinkage11,63.

However, as shown in Fig. 14f, 2.5% HPPM had a higher porosity, causing the specimen to be non-homogeneous. Furthermore, the HPPM fibers have a bridging effect, which can lead to increased compressive and flexural strengths. In reality, lower permeability and capillary porosity are closely related. It may be deduced that the voids in 2.5% HPPM, which are more than those in 2% HPPM, are caused by HPPM fibers trapping air in the mixture. Furthermore, the HPPM stripes and fibers can act as a binder all over the fibers and aggregated in this micrograph, potentially causing pore blockage and decreased permeability. In reality, lower permeability and capillary porosity are closely related. The voids in 2.5% HPPM, which are more than those in 2% HPPM, are likely caused by fibers that have trapped air in the mixture.

Some researchers have recently emphasized the effect of fissures on concrete permeability64 investigated the effect of the fracture width on concrete permeability in an experimental setting. Shin et al.65 studied the influence of concrete permeability on fracture type, crack width, and water head. Yang et al.66 used X-ray CT to monitor the water transport parameters of cracked concrete and indicated that fracture morphology and tortuosity should be studied in future research.

The main role of HPPM in concrete construction is shown in Fig. 15. As shown, the stresses arising from plastic shrinkage exceed the concrete strength in the initial hours of its age, when both the strength and Young's modulus are quite low. As a result, shrinkage cracks form. The formation of cracks is slowed by a high number of equally dispersed HPPM, which reduce the crack width by two orders of magnitude5. Of note, cracks are not detrimental to construction or serviceability if they do not exceed a particular size. When concrete transitions from a plastic to a solid state and the Young’s modulus of the concrete exceeds the Young's modulus of the fibers, micro HPPMs no longer play a significant role. In this study, concrete samples with no fibers had a breaking area of 1743 mm2 in the study67, whereas those containing 0.5 and 1.0% PPF had cracking areas of 992 and 99 mm2, respectively. According to this study, the presence of HPPM increases the drying shrinkage resistance of concrete.

Schematic representation of the mechanism of bridging formed by HPPM at 2% fibers which they acting as. Crack-bridging activity during the failure.

The addition of macro HPPM fibers can change the fracture shape based on the aforementioned physical and mechanical data. This behavior can be attributed to the macro polypropylene fibers, which are scattered stochastically in the matrix, preventing the matrix fracture from propagating without stretching and debonding the fibers, resulting in a deviated crack-extension route. When comparing HPPM fiber specimens to control concrete samples, specimens with a fiber dosage of 2.5% showed the most significant increase in crack morphology.

The use of fibers from various raw materials is efficient in controlling crack formation on exposed concrete surfaces caused by early-age drying shrinkage37. Because they restricted the motions of the micro-level in concrete by bridging and stitching fine fractures, the PPF in concrete decreases the drying shrinkage and early cracking5. The effect of HPPM on matrix fracture behavior can be divided into two categories. First, the addition of HPPM fibers reduces the maximum stress as well as the elastic modulus of the mixtures. Second, after the grain-bridging crack face breaks, the stress can be transferred via cracks through the intersection of the fibers and cracks. Crack-bridging activity results in increased ductility in HPPM-fiber-reinforced concrete (Fig. 15).

In today's construction business, the issues of susceptibility and environmentally friendly materials are hotly debated12,13,14,68,69. CO2 concentrations in the environment have increased by 50% in the twenty-first century2. Concrete manufacturing accounts for 2–3% of annual energy demand and 8–9% of total CO2 emissions in the atmosphere70. Consequently, the construction industry now faces a new challenge: manufacturing concrete structures that meet environmental standards while also being more durable. Protecting steel bars from corrosion and sulfate attack improves the longevity of reinforced concrete, allowing water and ions to penetrate through cracks and pores2. Plastic shrinkage at an early age is widely recognized as one of the leading causes of concrete cracks. As a result, the concept of HPPM fiber inclusion appears to be quite useful in terms of long-term development. Ali et al.71 conducted a comparative study of plain concrete and concrete containing various types of fibers, including steel, glass, and PP. It was discovered that the manufacturing of PPF produced 30 and 9% less CO2 than steel and glass fibers, respectively. The environmental and economic issues associated with pavements made from the various concretes described above were evaluated. In addition, depending on the fiber dose, carbon emissions per m2 of pavement were reduced by 13–18%. The thickness of concrete pavement was reduced by 18% in another study72 owing to the use of PPF. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a global crisis with social, economic and environmental consequences73. Inappropriate management of spent HPPM is another plausible pathway for COVID-19 transmission. The present work encourages scientists to express their concerns to governments at all levels regarding the significance of implementing suitable solid waste management measures, such as HPPM, to prevent the spread of the novel coronavirus. With 50% of its population, Saudi Arabia is the most populous country in the Arabian Peninsula. To date, there have been 417,363 coronavirus cases and 6957 deaths. A total of $375,831 has been recovered (www.worldometers.info). As previously stated, the primary application of fiber-reinforced concrete is in the construction of structural elements. The prospect of employing such concrete to build architectural shapes is rarely considered. Public spaces are one of the fields of application in architecture. Public open spaces are one of the most important aspects of city life74, and their attractiveness affects how people view the city. Furthermore, as a result, cities are viewed as pleasant and inviting to people. HPPM stripes can be used to produce architectural shapes in public spaces, such as decorative pavements in scientific centers, shopping centers, restrooms, promenades, zoos and gardens, bus stations, parking areas, ferry terminals, feck rocks, beach areas, landscapes, door surrounds, and skate parks. Finally, characteristics of the materials utilized in these spaces should be considered.

Various efficient methods for cleaning the gathered HPPM are currently being used to convince the construction industry to use masks and other PPE waste without the risk of disease transmission. These techniques are as follows:

To help with supply constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA in the United States has approved hydrogen peroxide in vapour (VH2O2) for high-throughput decontamination of PPE, either alone or in combination with ozone.

UVC decontamination techniques, in particular those that utilize this wavelength, can also be used as a potential HPPM decontamination method. Other UV technologies are also used to avoid process harmonization.

Moist heating at 60–70 °C for 60 min in conjunction with high humidity is a viable decontaminating technology for HPPM since it offers scalability and high-throughput processing. For decontaminating PPE, microwave-generated steam would be ineffectual.

Physical irradiation methods such as ethylene oxide, electron beams, and gamma radiation are useless for recycling HPPM75.

Materials utilized in earlier studies have varied in size and length/width ratio. Kilmartin-Lynch et al.12 have employed tiny pieces that measure 2 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width. Koniorczyk et al.13 used samples that were 0.5 cm long and 0.4 cm wide, whereas Ran et al.15 used samples that were 2 cm long and 0.4 cm wide. In this article, the HPPM was cut into small pieces with a length of 1 cm and a width of 1 cm. The scope of this work does not include size effect and the length/width ratio effect, which need further investigation in future work.

The main function of HPPM stripes in concrete construction is to reduce plastic shrinkage cracks. Changes in the mixture can improve many characteristics of HPPM-fiber-reinforced concrete. However, certain qualities have insignificant effects or are difficult to assess. Of note, the conclusion that a higher HPPM fiber content results in better characteristics is not always correct, and an excessive amount of fibers can cause substantial deterioration. For example, polypropylene fibers improve the material characteristics up to a specific dosage, which, if exceeded, has detrimental consequences. When determining the ideal HPPM fiber content, it is critical to consider the mixture composition and fiber quality. HPPM fiber-reinforced concrete applications in open public places are a promising field. Because concrete is subjected to adverse environmental conditions, damage, abrasion of the surface, and vandalism, using concrete with enhanced quality is definitely advantageous.

In sustainable concrete, various percentages of iron waste (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5%) were employed. The slump, compressive strength, flexural strength, abrasion resistance, impact resistance, sorptivity, spalling test, water absorption, porosity, water penetration, permeability, and UPV were investigated. The following conclusions were drawn based on the results of these experiments.

When HPPM fibers are added to the concrete mixture, they reduce the workability of the new concrete and have the potential to improve some of the mechanical qualities of the concrete when utilized in small amounts.

Compared with the control mix, HPPM improved the overall quality of the concrete because the fibers were more evenly spread, resulting in higher compressive and flexural strengths. Because it restricted the movements at the micro-level in concrete by bridging and sewing fine cracks, HPPM decreased the drying shrinkage and early cracking in the concrete. The mixture with 2% HPPM fiber content yielded the highest compressive and flexural strengths.

XRD showed that after introducing PP fibers, neither Ca(CO)3 nor Ca(OH)2 was altered appreciably. This demonstrates that the fibers are incapable of participating in chemical reactions. The presence of fibers causes a considerable change in the cracking pattern of the concrete. While unreinforced concrete forms wide and long cracks, the inclusion of fibers reduces the crack width opening, cracked area, and crack propagation through the bridging activity of the fibers. Crack networks become less connected as a result of adding the fibers.

Water absorption in hardened concrete is reduced when HPPM stripes and fibers were added separately in low-volume fractions to the concrete mixture. Furthermore, the use of HPPM fibers in small volume fractions reduced the porosity of the concrete specimens. Among all the concrete specimens, the concrete containing 2% HPPM fibers had the lowest water absorption and porosity percentage. Regardless of the volume concentration of HPPM, all concrete mixes were subject to the same high standard of excellent quality and structural strength.

Microfractures propagate along concrete with HPPM, according to a concrete microstructure study. As demonstrated in SEM images, HPPM fibers (2%) play a significant role in fracture bridging. However, when the volume percentage of the fibers is higher (2.5% of HPPM), voids form and grow between the cement paste and the fiber, reducing the concrete's strength qualities. As a result, HPPM can be utilized to make sustainable concrete and produce a clean, environmentally friendly building material. In addition, the HPPM fibers employed in this study were classified as short or discontinuous, which could lead to increased UCS, FS, and abrasion resistance.

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Polypropylene stripes

Healthy personal protective materials

Single-used face mask

Uniaxial compressive strength

Flexural strength

Ultrasonic pulse velocity

Scanning electron microscope

X-ray diffraction patterns

Porosity

Water absorption

Impact strength

Abrasion resistance

Sorptivity coefficients

Blazy, J. & Blazy, R. Polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete and its application in creating architectural forms of public spaces. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 14, e00549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00549 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Mehta, P. K. & Burrows, R. W. Building durable structures in the 21st century. Concr. Int. 23(3), 57–63 (2001).

Google Scholar

Islam, G. S. & Gupta, S. D. Evaluating plastic shrinkage and permeability of polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(2), 345–354 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

García-Taengua, E., Arango, S., Martí-Vargas, J. R. & Serna, P. Flexural creep of steel fiber reinforced concrete in the cracked state. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.139 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Yin, S. et al. Use of macro plastic fibres in concrete: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 93, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.105 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Balaguru, P. & Najm, H. High-performance fiber-reinforced concrete mixture proportions with high fiber volume fractions. Mater. J. 101(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.14359/13361 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Xu, H. et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete: Effect of cellulose fiber, polyvinyl alcohol fiber and polyolefin fiber. Constr. Build. Mater. 261, 120610 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mohajerani, A. et al. Amazing types, properties, and applications of fibres in construction materials. Materials 12(16), 2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162513 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Marković, I. High-Performance Hybrid-Fibre Concrete: Development and Utilisation (IOS Press, 2006).

Google Scholar

Karahan, O. & Atiş, C. D. The durability properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced fly ash concrete. Mater. Des. 32(2), 1044–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.011 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zych, T. & Krasodomski, W. Polyolefin fibres used in cementitious composites–manufacturing, properties and application. Czasopismo Tech. 2016(Budownictwo Zeszyt 3-B (9) 2016), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.16.223.5972 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Kilmartin-Lynch, S., Saberian, M., Li, J., Roychand, R. & Zhang, G. Preliminary evaluation of the feasibility of using polypropylene fibers from COVID-19 single-use face masks to improve the mechanical properties of concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 296, 126460 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Koniorczyk, M., Bednarska, D., Masek, A. & Cichosz, S. Performance of concrete containing recycled masks used for personal protection during coronavirus pandemic. Constr. Build. Mater. 324, 126712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126712 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Castellote, M., Jiménez-Relinque, E., Grande, M., Rubiano, F. J. & Castillo, Á. Face mask wastes as cementitious materials: A possible solution to a big concern. Materials 15(4), 1371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15041371 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ran, T., Pang, J. & Zou, J. An emerging solution for medical waste: Reuse of COVID-19 protective suit in concrete. Sustainability 14(16), 10045 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Al-Hadithi, A. I. & Hilal, N. N. The possibility of enhancing some properties of self-compacting concrete by adding waste plastic fibers. J. Build. Eng. 8, 20–28 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Al-Hadithi, A. I., Noaman, A. T. & Mosleh, W. K. Mechanical properties and impact behavior of PET fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete (SCC). Compos. Struct. 224, 111021 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

ASTM C39, C39M-21. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM International, 2021).

Google Scholar

ASTM C496, C496M-17. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (ASTM International, 2017).

Google Scholar

ASTM C78, C78M-21. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading) (ASTM International, 2021).

Google Scholar

ASTM C597–16. Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete (ASTM International, 2016).

Google Scholar

ISRM (2007) The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group Ankara, 628 p.

BS EN 12390-8:2009 Testing hardened concrete. Depth of penetration of water under pressure.

Das, C. S., Dey, T., Dandapat, R., Mukharjee, B. B. & Kumar, J. Performance evaluation of polypropylene fibre reinforced recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 189, 649–659 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

ASTM D792–20. Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement (ASTM International, 2020).

Google Scholar

ASTM D7138-16. Standard Test Method to Determine Melting Temperature of Synthetic Fibers (ASTM International, 2016).

Google Scholar

ASTM D570-98. Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics (ASTM International, 2018).

Google Scholar

ASTM D638–14. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (ASTM International, 2014).

Google Scholar

Saberian, M., Li, J., Kilmartin-Lynch, S. & Boroujeni M. Repurposing of COVID-19 single-use face masks for pavements base/subbase. Sci. Total Environ. 769, 145527 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nili, M. & Afroughsabet, V. The effects of silica fume and polypropylene fibers on the impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 24(6), 927–933 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Mohammadhosseini, H., Awal, A. A. & Yatim, J. B. M. The impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete reinforced with waste polypropylene carpet fibres. Constr. Build. Mater. 143, 147–157 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ravinder, R., Kumar, V., Kumar, C., Prakash, A., & Krishna, P. V. (2019). Strength characteristics of fibrous self curing concrete using super absorbent polymer. in Proceedings of the National Conference on Recent Advances in Civil Engineering, Coimbatore, India, pp. 8–9.

Ahmmad, R. et al. Performance evaluation of palm oil clinker as coarse aggregate in high strength lightweight concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 566–574 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Şimşek, B., Uygunoğlu, T., Korucu, H., & Kocakerim, M. M. (2019). Performance of dioctyl terephthalate concrete. In Use of Recycled Plastics in Eco-efficient Concrete (pp. 249–267). Woodhead Publishing.

Khatib, J. M., Herki, B. A. & Elkordi, A. 7: characteristics of concrete containing EPS. In Use of Recycled Plastics in Eco-Efficient Concrete (eds Pacheco-Torgal, F. et al.) (Woodhead Publishing, 2019).

Google Scholar

Yap, S. P., Alengaram, U. J. & Jumaat, M. Z. Enhancement of mechanical properties in polypropylene-and nylon-fibre reinforced oil palm shell concrete. Mater. Des. 49, 1034–1041 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shi, F., Pham, T. M., Hao, H. & Hao, Y. Post-cracking behaviour of basalt and macro polypropylene hybrid fibre reinforced concrete with different compressive strengths. Constr. Build. Mater. 262, 120108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120108 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

IS 13311 (Part I): 1992 Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete Methods of test (Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity).

Ramezanianpour, A. A., Esmaeili, M., Ghahari, S. A. & Najafi, M. H. Laboratory study on the effect of polypropylene fiber on durability, and physical and mechanical characteristic of concrete for application in sleepers. Constr. Build. Mater. 44, 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.076 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Feng, J. et al. Experimental study on hybrid effect evaluation of fiber reinforced concrete subjected to drop weight impacts. Materials 11(12), 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122563 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Widodo, S. Fresh and hardened properties of polypropylene fiber added self-consolidating concrete. Int. J. Civ. Struct. Eng. 3(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.6088/ijcser.201203013008 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jain, A. K. & Chouhan, J. S. Effect of shape of aggregate on compressive strength and permeability properties of pervious concrete. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Stud. 1(1), 120–126 (2011).

Google Scholar

Broda, J. Application of polypropylene fibrillated fibres for reinforcement of concrete and cement mortars. High Perf. Concr. Technol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.5772/64386 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Olgun, M. Effects of polypropylene fiber inclusion on the strength and volume change characteristics of cement-fly ash stabilized clay soil. Geosynth. Int. 20(4), 263275 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Kalifa, P., Chene, G. & Galle, C. High-temperature behaviour of HPC with polypropylene fibres: From spalling to microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 31(10), 1487–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00596-8 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Algourdin, N., Pliya, P., Beaucour, A. L., Simon, A. & Noumowé, A. Influence of polypropylene and steel fibres on thermal spalling and physical-mechanical properties of concrete under different heating rates. Constr. Build. Mater. 259, 119690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119690 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Horszczaruk, E. Abrasion resistance of high-performance hydraulic concrete with polypropylene fibers. Tribologia 1, 63–72 (2012).

Google Scholar

Grdic, Z. J., Curcic, G. A. T., Ristic, N. S. & Despotovic, I. M. Abrasion resistance of concrete micro-reinforced with polypropylene fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 27(1), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.044 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Afroughsabet, V. & Ozbakkaloglu, T. Mechanical and durability properties of high-strength concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 94, 73–82 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Afroughsabet, V., Biolzi, L. & Ozbakkaloglu, T. High-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 51(14), 6517–6551 (2016).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Behfarnia, K. & Behravan, A. Application of high performance polypropylene fibers in concrete lining of water tunnels. Mater. Des. 55, 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.075 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bolat, H., Şimşek, O., Çullu, M., Durmuş, G. & Can, Ö. The effects of macro synthetic fiber reinforcement use on physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Compos. B Eng. 61, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.043 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fallah, S. & Nematzadeh, M. Mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete containing macro-polymeric and polypropylene fibers with nano-silica and silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 132, 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.100 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ismail, S. & Ramli, M. Effects of adding fibre on strength and permeability of recycled aggregate concrete containing treated coarse RCA. Int. J. Civil Environ. Eng. 8(8), 918–924 (2014).

Google Scholar

Mohammadhosseini, H. & Yatim, J. M. Evaluation of the effective mechanical properties of concrete composites using industrial waste carpet fiber. INAE Lett. 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41403-017-0016-x (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Hager, I., Mróz, K., & Tracz, T. (2019). Contribution of polypropylene fibres melting to permeability change in heated concrete-the fibre amount and length effect. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 706, No. 1, p. 012009). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/706/1/012009.

Zhang, P. & Li, Q. F. Effect of polypropylene fiber on durability of concrete composite containing fly ash and silica fume. Compos. B Eng. 45(1), 1587–1594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.006 (2013).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kakooei, S., Akil, H. M., Jamshidi, M. & Rouhi, J. The effects of polypropylene fibers on the properties of reinforced concrete structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 27(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.015 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Medina, N. F., Barluenga, G. & Hernández-Olivares, F. Combined effect of Polypropylene fibers and Silica Fume to improve the durability of concrete with natural Pozzolans blended cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 96, 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.050 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Sivakumar, A. & Santhanam, M. Mechanical properties of high strength concrete reinforced with metallic and non-metallic fibres. Cement Concr. Compos. 29(8), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.006 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ahmed, K. S., Vijayarangan, S. & Rajput, C. Mechanical behavior of isothalic polyester-based untreated woven jute and glass fabric hybrid composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 25(15), 1549–1569 (2006).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Yang, J., Wang, R. & Zhang, Y. Influence of dually mixing with latex powder and polypropylene fiber on toughness and shrinkage performance of overlay repair mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 261, 120521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120521 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sivakumar, A. & Santhanam, M. A quantitative study on the plastic shrinkage cracking in high strength hybrid fibre reinforced concrete. Cement Concr. Compos. 29(7), 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.005 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wang, K., Jansen, D. C., Shah, S. P. & Karr, A. F. Permeability study of cracked concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 27(3), 381–393 (1997).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Shin, K. J., Bae, W., Choi, S. W., Son, M. W. & Lee, K. M. Parameters influencing water permeability coefficient of cracked concrete specimens. Constr. Build. Mater. 151, 907–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.093 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Yang, L., Gao, D., Zhang, Y. & She, W. Study on water and chloride transport in cracked mortar using X-ray CT, gravimetric method and natural immersion method. Constr. Build. Mater. 176, 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.094 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cao, Q., Wang, R., Jia, J., Zhou, C. & Lin, Z. A comparative study of combined treatments for enhanced early-age cracking control of self-consolidating concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 248, 118473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118473 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Ducoli, S., Zacco, A. & Bontempi, E. Incineration of sewage sludge and recovery of residue ash as building material: A valuable option as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Environ. Manage. 282, 111966 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Abdullah, G. M. & Abd El Aal, A. Assessment of the reuse of Covid-19 healthy personal protective materials in enhancing geotechnical properties of Najran’s soil for road construction: Numerical and experimental study. J. Clean. Prod. 320, 128772 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Monteiro, P. J., Miller, S. A. & Horvath, A. Towards sustainable concrete. Nat. Mater. 16(7), 698–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4930 (2017).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ali, B., Qureshi, L. A. & Kurda, R. Environmental and economic benefits of steel, glass, and polypropylene fiber reinforced cement composite application in jointed plain concrete pavement. Compos. Commun. 22, 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100437 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Garg, R. & Garg, R. Performance evaluation of polypropylene fiber waste reinforced concrete in presence of silica fume. Mater. Today: Proc. 43, 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.482 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cornelio, A. et al. Environmental impact of surgical masks consumption in Italy Due to COVID-19 pandemic. Materials 15(6), 2046 (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gehl, J. Cities for People (Island Press, 2013).

Google Scholar

Abd El Aal, A., Abdullah, G. M., Qadri, S. T., Abotalib, A. Z. & Othman, A. Advances on concrete strength properties after adding polypropylene fibers from health personal protective equipment (PPE) of COVID-19: Implication on waste management and sustainable environment. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 128, 103260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103260 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

The publication was funded by the Priority Research Area Anthropocene under the program “Excellence Initiative—Research University” at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland. The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under Najran Region Research Program Funding program grant code (NU/NAR/SERC/11/34). Thanks to the handling editor, Dr. Farhad Aslani, for his handling of our article and to the four reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve our article.

Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Ahmed Abd El Aal & Amr Fenais

Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Mabkhoot A. Alsaiari

Empty Quarter Research Unit, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science and Arts at Sharurah, Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Mabkhoot A. Alsaiari

Faculty of Geography and Geology, Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 3a, 30-387, Kraków, Poland

Ahmed E. Radwan

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A.A.E.A.: Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, analysis, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing, M.A.A.: Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing, A.E.R.: Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, analysis, writing- original draft preparation, reviewing and editing, A.F.: Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation writing- original draft preparation, reviewing and editing.

Correspondence to Ahmed E. Radwan.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

El Aal, A.A., Alsaiari, M.A., Radwan, A.E. et al. Smart waste management perspective of COVID-19 healthy personal protective materials in concrete for decorative landscape pavements and artificial rocks. Sci Rep 13, 2904 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30104-1

Download citation

Received: 29 July 2022

Accepted: 15 February 2023

Published: 18 February 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30104-1

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.